The TTABlogger has once again chosen the ten (10) TTAB (Tee-Tee-Ā-Bee) decisions that he considers to be the most important and/or interesting from the previous calendar year (2021). This is the first of two (2) posts; the first five (5) selections are set out below. Additional commentary on each case may be found … Chapter 100 GENERAL INFORMATION 101 Applicable Authority 101.01 Statute and Rules of Practice 101.02 Federal Rules 101.03 Decisional Law 101.04 Director’s Orders and Notices Jan 2, 2022 · The Board has re-designated this opinion as precedential. In a 51-page opinion, the Board affirmed a refusal to register the product configuration shown below, for "handbags," finding the design to be generic and, alternatively, lacking in acquired distinctiveness: "Handbags embodying the proposed mark are so common in the industry that such product design is not capable of indicating source ... The TTABlogger has once again chosen the ten (10) TTAB (Tee-Tee-Ā-Bee) decisions that he considers to be the most important and/or interesting from the previous calendar year (2021). This is the first of two (2) posts; the first five (5) selections are set out below. Additional commentary on each case may be found …The CAFC pointed out that "even marketplace users of a term lacking secondary meaning for the users are among the uses" that must be counted in assessing whether a mark has been in "substantially exclusive" use.Mandatory electronic filing. The TTAB requires electronic filing using the Electronic System for Trademark Trials and Appeals (ESTTA) for all submissions in TTAB proceedings and requests for extensions of time to oppose. If ESTTA is unavailable due to technical problems, or when extraordinary circumstances are present, customers may …The Board reversed a refusal to register the mark shown here, comprising a “truck cab body in the design of a fanciful, prehistoric animal,” for “entertainment services, namely, performing and competing in motor sports events in the nature of monster truck exhibitions,” rejecting the examining attorney’s …Here's another 2017 precedential interlocutory ruling that slipped under the TTABlog radar. In this consolidated opposition and cancellation proceeding, the Board considered whether an answer may be amended to add an omitted counterclaim "when justice so requires," or whether under FRCP 15 a …The November-December 2023 (Vol. 113 No. 6) issue of the Trademark Reporter has been published. [pdf here ]. Willard Knox, Editor-in-Chief, summarizes the contents as follows (and below): "This issue offers our readers an article proposing an innovative, neuroscience-based approach to establishing likelihood of confusion, an article detailing ...👍 SUB New Channel : https://www.youtube.com/user/extremedit360 ️ HOT VIDEO : 🔸Stripped of Dignity : https://youtu.be/5-8kLnEg4Ts 🔸Stranded : https://youtu...So far this year, the TTAB has affirmed 162 of the 174 Section 2(d) refusals on appeal (about 93%). Here are three decisions that came down recently. How do you think they came out? [Results in first comment].The TTABlog<sup>®</sup>: Precedential No. 10: TTAB Affirms Refusal to Register Handbag Shape: Generic and (Alternatively) Lacking Acquired Distinctiveness. …BREAKING! TTAB Reverses Six Refusals to Register NY Times Column Titles, in Precedential Ruling http://ttabvue.uspto.gov/ttabvue/ttabvue-90112154-EXA … 1 Chapter One John C. Heinbockel I. Strategic Considerations for TTAB-Contested Proceedings: A TTAB Proceeding versus a Court Action Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB, or the Board) proceedings can 1 Chapter One John C. Heinbockel I. Strategic Considerations for TTAB-Contested Proceedings: A TTAB Proceeding versus a Court Action Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB, or the Board) proceedings can The State Bar of California will host two one-day seminars on trademark law on April 11 (Los Angeles) and April 13 (San Francisco), entitled "The Trademark Office Comes to California."Sep 21, 2023 · The TTABlog<sup>®</sup>: Precedential No. 27: TTAB Renders Split Decision in Appeal From Section 2 (d) Refusal of IMPACT for Various Healthcare Services. Keeping Tabs on the TTAB®. by John L. Welch. Thursday, September 21, 2023. Mar 1, 2024 · The TTABlog® Running Index. Keeping Tabs on the TTAB®. by John L. Welch. Friday, February 23, 2024. TTABlog Running Index: January 2024 to Date. E-mail subscriptions to the TTABlog are available. Just enter your e-mail address in the box on the right to receive a daily update via Feedblitz. The USPTO refused to register the proposed mark SPECTACLES for wearable computer hardware and peripherals, on the ground of genericness. Applicant Snap argued that its product does not correct vision, but is "a sophisticated digital camera with a battery and related software and hardware that allow users to upload pictures and …TTAB Posts September 2021 (Video) Hearing Schedule. The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (Tee-Tee-Ā-Bee) has scheduled six (VI) oral hearings for the month of September 2021. The hearings will be held via video conference. Briefs and other papers for each case may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.The State Bar of California will host two one-day seminars on trademark law on April 11 (Los Angeles) and April 13 (San Francisco), entitled "The Trademark Office Comes to California."The November-December 2023 (Vol. 113 No. 6) issue of the Trademark Reporter has been published. [pdf here ]. Willard Knox, Editor-in-Chief, summarizes the contents as follows (and below): "This issue offers our readers an article proposing an innovative, neuroscience-based approach to establishing likelihood of confusion, an article detailing ... PREFACE TO THE JUNE 2023 REVISION. The June 2023 revision is an update of the June 2022 edition. This update is moderate in nature and incorporates relevant case law issued between March 4, 2022 and March 3, 2023. The title of the manual is abbreviated as "TBMP." A citation to a section of the manual may be written as "TBMP § _____ (2023)." TTABVUE is the online system that lets you access the status and records of trademark cases and appeals at the USPTO. You can view, print, or download the documents ...False Suggestion of a Connection: The Board focused on the "key factor" in the Section 2(a) false suggestion analysis: "whether applicants’ mark is a close approximation of opposers’ name or identity, i.e., a right in which opposers possess a protectable interest."Moreover, the similarity required for a "close approximation" is "akin …เมษายน 27, 2017 by ttabblog. First blog post. มีนาคม 27, 2017 มีนาคม 27, 2017 by ttabblog. This is the excerpt for your very first post. More Posts สร้างเว็บไซต์หรือบล็อกฟรีที่ WordPress.com.Here's another 2017 precedential interlocutory ruling that slipped under the TTABlog radar. In this consolidated opposition and cancellation proceeding, the Board considered whether an answer may be amended to add an omitted counterclaim "when justice so requires," or whether under FRCP 15 a …Dec 2, 2021 · A potential opposer has thirty (30) days after the date of publication in the Trademark Official Gazaette, or within the extension period granted by the Board, to file an opposition. TMEP § 1503.03. If you are unsure about potential litigation and need longer than thirty (30) days to make a decision, you must file a request to extend the time ... Jul 2, 2018 · Step 1: Select search from the "Edit" pull-down menu or clicking your mouse on the binocular icon in the toolbar at the top of your Adobe Reader window. Alternatively, use Ctrl+Shift+F to bring up the Adobe Search windowin the toolbar. The search options window will appear on the right side of the screen. November 2018 TTAB . Designation of TTAB Decisions as Precedential . An opinion or decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) may be designated as a The TTAB has re-designated as precedential its September 2022 opinion in this cancellation proceeding. [The CAFC affirmed the Board's decision on October 19, 2023 [TTABlogged here]].The Board granted a petition for cancellation of a registration for the mark CAPTAIN CANNABIS for comic books, on the ground of likelihood of confusion …In a 46-page Order, the Board denied Petitioner Zuru LLC's motion for sanctions and for further discovery in this cancellation proceeding based on the alleged genericness of the mark LEGO for toy building blocks. Zuru argued that the requested relief was warranted in view of Respondent Lego’s purported misconduct related to its …Tesla delivered 422,875 electric vehicles in the first quarter of 2023, just beating Wall Street estimates of around 420,000 units. Tesla said Sunday it delivered 422,875 electric ...The Top Ten TTAB Decisions of 2015. The Top Ten TTAB Decisions of 2014-2015. The Sixty-Seventh Year of Administration of the Lanham Act of 1946. The Top Ten TTAB Decisions of 2014. Decisions of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board and the Federal Circuit on Registrability Issues June 2012 to March 2014.The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (Tee-Tee-Ā-Bee) has scheduled eight (8) oral hearings for the month of April 2023. Five of the hearings will be held via video conference; three will be held "in …The Board granted a petition for cancellation of a registration for the mark NAUGLES for restaurant services, finding that Respondent Del Taco abandoned use of the mark beginning in 1995, for a period of more than three consecutive years without an intent to resume use.Christian M. Ziebarth v. Del Taco, LLC, Cancellation No. 92053501 …In April 2020, the Board affirmed a Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark INFORMATION BUILDERS and Design (above left) for database software and related design services, finding the mark confusingly similar to the design mark shown above right, for overlapping software and services.In re Information …Two Cuban corporations sought to cancel a Supplemental Registration for the mark PINAR DEL RÍO for cigars, on four grounds: Section 2(a) deceptiveness; Section 2(e)(3) geographically deceptive misdescriptiveness; violation of the Pan American Convention because the mark is an indication of geographical origin or source but the …Once in a great while, a precedential interlocutory ruling of the TTAB slips through the TTABlog crack.Here's one from December 2015 (although I can't understand why it earned the precedential label).TTABlog Quarterly Index: October - December 2021. 03 January 2022. by John L. Welch. Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C. Your LinkedIn Connections. with the authors. E-mail subscriptions to the TTABlog are available. Just enter your e-mail address in the box on the right to receive a daily update via Feedblitz. You may also follow the TTABlog on ...The TTABlogger has once again chosen the ten (10) TTAB (Tee-Tee-Ā-Bee) decisions that he considers to be the most important and/or interesting from the previous calendar year (2023). This is the first of two (2) posts; the first five (5) selections are set out below. The second five selections are posted …E-mail subscriptions to the TTABlog are available. Just enter your e-mail address in the box on the right to receive a daily update via Feedblitz. You may also follow the TTABlog on Twitter: @TTABlog. Section 2(a) - False Association: TTAB Reverses Section 2(a) False Association Refusal of "WILL AND KATE …So far this year, the TTAB has affirmed 162 of the 174 Section 2(d) refusals on appeal (about 93%). Here are three decisions that came down recently. How do you think they came out? [Results in first comment].TTAB Posts August 2019 Hearing Schedule. The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (Tee-Tee-Ā-Bee) has scheduled seven (7) oral hearings for the month of August 2019. The hearings will be held in the East Wing of the Madison Building, in Alexandria, Virginia. Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links … November 2018 TTAB . Designation of TTAB Decisions as Precedential . An opinion or decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) may be designated as a Joseph Barton applied to register BARTON FAMILY WINERY for "wine" [WINERY disclaimed], but the USPTO refused registration under Section 2(d) on the ground of likelihood of confusion with the registered mark THOMAS BARTON for "alcoholic beverages, namely, wines." Applicant avoided a Section 2(e)(4) refusal by seeking …This chart shows the average 401(k) balance at every age. See how you stack up. By clicking "TRY IT", I agree to receive newsletters and promotions from Money and its partners. I a...👍 SUB New Channel : https://www.youtube.com/user/extremedit360 ️ HOT VIDEO : 🔸Stripped of Dignity : https://youtu.be/5-8kLnEg4Ts 🔸Stranded : https://youtu...Jan 2, 2022 · The Board has re-designated this opinion as precedential. In a 51-page opinion, the Board affirmed a refusal to register the product configuration shown below, for "handbags," finding the design to be generic and, alternatively, lacking in acquired distinctiveness: "Handbags embodying the proposed mark are so common in the industry that such product design is not capable of indicating source ... The TTABlog. The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances. AUTHOR(S) John L. Welch Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C. ARTICLE TAGS. United States Intellectual ...The Board affirmed a Section 2(e)(1) refusal to register the proposed mark SMART BEZEL, finding it to be merely descriptive of electronic sensor modules for controlling and integrating home automation systems, lighting systems, and smart heating systems [SMART disclaimed].Applicant Zuma Array contended that its goods are not …About Press Copyright Contact us Creators Advertise Developers Terms Privacy Policy & Safety How YouTube works Test new features NFL Sunday Ticket Press Copyright ...The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”) issued more than 600 final decisions and numerous interlocutory rulings in 2022. Thirty-eight of the Board’s opinions were deemed precedential. This article collects ten decisions – listed in no particular order – on a variety of issues that the author finds of importance or … Prior compilations of the Trademark rules and statutes are available. All attorneys and agents practicing before the USPTO in trademark or patent matters are subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et. seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19 (a). The TTABlog® Running Index is a blog that tracks the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) decisions and the latest trademark news. It covers topics such as …In a non-precedential ruling, the CAFC affirmed the TTAB's decision in University of Southern California v.The University of South Carolina, Opposition No. 91125615 (August 1, 2008) [not precedential].[TTABlogged here].At the Board level, the Trojans of USC (California) topped the Gamecocks of USC (South Carolina) in a Section …Here's everything you need to know before booking a stay at the Querencia de Sevilla, Autograph Collection in Sevilla, Spain. Like many travelers who visit Spain, my first two trip.... TTABlog Quarterly Index: April - June 2022The Board ordered consolidation of two opposit The CAFC pointed out that "even marketplace users of a term lacking secondary meaning for the users are among the uses" that must be counted in assessing whether a mark has been in "substantially exclusive" use.The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) weaved its way through Supreme Court precedent on the law of color marks in vacating and remanding the TTAB’s decision upholding a refusal to register a color mark for multiple colors applied to product packaging. The Board concluded that such a mark cannot be inherently distinctive ... The Board observed that a "goods in trade" refusal is found About Press Copyright Contact us Creators Advertise Developers Terms Privacy Policy & Safety How YouTube works Test new features NFL Sunday Ticket Press Copyright ... What a year! Despite the tumult, the TTABlogger has once aga...
Continue Reading